Awaiting reviewer selection after major revision sample. Awaiting Reviewer Selection.

Awaiting reviewer selection after major revision sample It is just guessing. After submission, I got a major revision decision from two reviewers. Sage’s Reviewer Selection Handbook has some excellent advice on how to build an effective reviewer database. Revisions of papers with a "Major revision" decision should be resubmitted within at most three months. 5 resubmitted 11. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I resubmitted. and received a confirmation e-mail after 2 days stating that my paper has passed the initial screening and it is now awaiting reviewer selection. A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer Recommendations". One reviewer suggested to accepts it as is, the second didn't give a response. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. Your manuscript has cleared desk screening If accepted, the paper is sent to production. Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. user32537 user32537. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. Possible decisions are Accept, Minor revision, Major revision, and Reject. 24 Major revision (3 reviewers, 18 comments) Smile执着 2023-01-18 Hello, may I ask how much is Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. However, today, After 5 months I received a "Major revision". What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. 10 Awaiting reviewer scores 11. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. Very responsible. Now, it is in the “Awaiting Reviewers Selection” mode once again. For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been secured, or if a reviewer was secured but had to withdraw and hasn’t yet been replaced After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. My personal guideline was to invite new reviewers if the previous reviewer had gone seven days without answering the invitation. Pub-Express I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. If you recommend acceptance, provide detail justifying rated reviews, you will be more likely to be selected to review again. You want to make the referee's and editor's job as easy as possible. Improve this answer. 5. Reconsider after major revision, appropriate to select if you believe that significant revisions to the manuscript are necessary before it could be reconsidered. Follow answered Apr 1, 2015 at 8:59. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. Since then the status changed to "awaiting referee scores" then a bit later to "awaiting recommendation", which was the status for about two weeks, and a few days ago it changed back to "awaiting referee scores". Hot Network Questions Why does the United Kingdom's handgun ban not apply to Northern Ireland? You haven’t mentioned how many reviewers accepted the peer review the first time. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. For example entering ‘rev*’ into the ‘quick search’ box will show you all reviewers whose first or last name Make a decision of ‘Minor Revision’, ‘Moderate Revision’ or ‘Major Revision’. However, for Scientific Reports, it’s typically two or three. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. My first round of review went well, with one reviewer only suggesting stylistic improvements Reviewers, in fact, can recommend one of five decisions: a) publish as is, b) minor revision and publish, c) minor revision and re-review, d) major revision and re-review, and e) reject. It means that the peer reviewer considers a manuscript suitable for publication if the authors rectify some major shortcomings. Is this I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. 12. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? publications; peer What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'Major revisions' is one of the most common peer review decisions. Typically, the AE invites the same set of reviewers, although there is the option to add new reviewers (if After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. " This status has not been changed for a month. There were 3 different reviewers and they made very relevant comments that I found very useful. This change has occurred I contacted the journal several times, but there was no reply. 2022 In peer review process 23. after a 2nd revision) may not require any editorial summary. 20 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 9. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the In case of major revisions, revised manuscripts are almost always sent for a second round of peer review. ’ How much more time should I wait for a response? Submitted on October 27th last year, it has been revised twice. (3) Reconsider (re-review) after major revision: At least one reviewer recommends “Reconsider (re-review) after major revision”, and no “Reject” is recommended. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. This Reviewer Selection Handbook aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each manuscript and improve time to decision for our authors. The author’s claims are not Reviewer Guidelines the magazine for high-tech The reviewers' and editors' comments provide guideposts as to why a paper receives a “major” versus “minor” revision decision. I addressed every single comment of reviewers and made all the suggested changes. When prompted by an email notification, log in to your editor center and find the manuscript from the dashboard link “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This change has occurred like what @Eppicurt said, it's hard to tell without knowing the details, but if after the first round of review, the verdict is "minor revision", and you've done what the reviewers suggested, then I would say it has a good chance of being accepted (this is from my own experience both as author and reviewer, but NOT in biology field), worst case you probably Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. Skip to main content. In most cases, the revised manuscript will be re-assigned to the original Editor. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. At this In my field (chemistry), the practice is: for those journals that make a clear distinction between minor and major revision requests, “major revision” means that the paper will have to undergo further review after revision, usually My paper underwent a revision. In this case, the revised manuscript must be sent to the reviewers for reassessment. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. I wa • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). A major revision was submitted to a journal. Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" All of this happened today and I only submitted the article 2 weeks ago. If you wanna know in detail what is going on, the only option you have, is to e-mail the editor. Hi. This change has occurred I received a revise and resubmit decision in mid-July. Bottom line, it's all depends how well you respond to reviewer comments and how much reviewer and editor get satisfy with your revised version. I also told them that “if it takes longer or they do not respond, I consider withdrawing and resubmitting the manuscript to another journal”. Proceedings A publishes articles across the chemical, computational, Earth, engineering, mathematical, and physical sciences. The submission is now with the author. After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. Where possible, this will be done by the original reviewers to check whether their comments have been addressed, however, if they are not available, other Reviewing a Revised Article If you’re reviewing a revised version of an article you’ve reviewed before, you should evaluate the updated article, any supplementary information, and the authors’ response to reviewers to determine if all your concerns have been addressed and if you are satisfied with the updates. Then I revised and resubmitted. * When major revision was required (ie increasing sample size for a clinical study),and because it wasn't impossible to do in the time allowed for answering (one month), and as I had sufficiently B. If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. 21 Awaiting reviewer assignment 10. One of the 3 reviewers asked to add a future research direction section. Once the adequate number of After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. As a result of this, you may receive a further round of comments from the same reviewers. Accept after major revisions (conditional acceptance): The journal will publish the paper provided the authors make the changes suggested by the reviewers and/or editors; Revise and resubmit (conditional rejection): The journal is willing to reconsider the paper in another round of decision making after the authors make major changes The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. Reviewers On most of the Society’s journals, Review complete: This is the largest variance part because some reviewers agree to review but don’t actually submit one, some reviewers decline, some reviewers never respond to the invitation, and so on. are invited to revise and resubmit your article (see decision notification e-mails and what they mean, below). there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. I got 'Major corrections' from two reviewers, however, Editor decided that I have to 'revise and resubmit'. (monocrystal sample) white or transparent? If the recommendation for your initial submission was minor or major revision and you have carefully addressed all reviewer comments, there is a good chance that your manuscript will finally be What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? 4. Awaiting reviewer score, it has been sent out to selected reviewers and is still awaiting for their scores (comments). For papers accepted after minor revision, the revised papers are often published without another full process of peer review. For some journals, including JGME, major versus minor is not determined by the number of comments, but by the journal's commitment to publish. 18 Submit for review after major revision 2. You may also wish to “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Revisions of papers with a "Minor revision" should be resubmitted with a month. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. We did everything they asked. Based on the information you have provided though, it was probably a major revision. It is definitely possible. Upon receipt of the two reviewers’ reports, the Editor makes the first decision of the following: Accept without further modification; Accept after minor revision; Accept after major revision; Reject; If the decision is to request revision of the manuscript, authors have 2 weeks to resubmit their revised manuscript. Months later I received a "Minor Revision". Additionally, after the revised manuscript is returned, each author will receive an email requesting supplementary One reviewer said, " publish as is" whereas the second one asked for major revision. For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been secured, or if a reviewer was secured but had to withdraw and hasn’t yet been replaced I just had a paper accepted after 2 rounds of revisions. Once enough reviewers have been selected, If the previous editorial decision was C (revise & re-review) or D (major revisions & re-review), the paper will be sent for re-review to the original reviewers, together with your responses. tral examples of each recommendation are provided in the screenshots below): 1) Publish As Is. Your article After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The manuscript is likely to be accepted after authors address requests for revision that do not involve major re-working of the data analysis and presentation or of the organization and text of the manuscript. Dears I submitted a paper, after 4 months I received major revisions from 2 reviewers. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. What could be In the case of a Revision decision, it would also include your view of essential enhancements the authors must make or any other particular issues related to the paper. . 2 reviewers were happy with the revisions, one reviewed the revisions, and we had to do more. It was sent back for further revisions on May 29th. It is usual for a paper to go through at least two author revisions before acceptance. Major revisions It is very unusual for a paper to be accepted without needing any revisions. This change has occurred For most manuscripts, in the first round of review, usually two peer reviewers are selected. The editor sent the manuscript to a third reviewer who suggested rejection with very negative comments in everything. It took 12 months & we had to hit their deadlines bc we were under scoop protection. " Since the status remained "reviewer assigned," we sent a mail with requesting clarification. You will now see a list of your assignments. If a manuscript does not have enough selections, invitations, or assigned reviewers to comply with the number of reviews required to make a decision, it will return to the Select Reviewers Queue. " 9. Click in the 'Take Action' column to view the submission or assign reviewers. In this article, we have grouped b, c, and d together under the heading ‘reviewers’ manuscript (major) revision’. I was wondering about the After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Maybe the reviewer(s) had some spare time, maybe a glance at the paper was enough (although that would be odd, as an editor would normally decide a straight reject if this is what the paper calls for) What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? Hot Revise: This indicates that a decision was made and a revision has been requested. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. 2022 Awaiting reviewer scores 19. There were three reviewers. In the absense of such 2. This change has occurred 2022. Once you have found potential reviewers using the selection tips provided in this document, you will need to verify them by taking the following steps: I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again 2023-7-18 awaiting final decision 2023-7-31 major revision 2023-8-12 revision submitted 2023-8-14 awaiting reviewer scores 2023-8-31 awaiting final decision 2023-9-4 accept This journal requires no more than 15 figures and tables. Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. Choose Minor Revision when you feel the paper should be accepted after slight revisions. I feel lucky this time to have encountered good editors and reviewers. As 3 months have past after re-submission, and the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Scores” for more than 1 month, I am going to send an inquiry to the journal. If this status is updated soon after submission, it could mean a desk rejection. Hi all, I have a question about revised manuscript. 14 submitted 9. There is Submissions that are ready for peer review will be displayed in the ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ queue: 2. Does it mean the work will be I recently submitted a manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne submission system. Add a What does it After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I answered all the reviewers and resubmitted the article. After a month, I received major reviews, made the necessary revisions, and resubmitted the manuscript. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home. In the case Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. Sage’s policy on recommended and opposed reviewers. Note that an Edit link appears here only if you have permission to adjust the Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. You haven’t also mentioned whether it was a major revision or a minor revision. Thank you for your assistance. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. 13 Awaiting admin. I want to know how long will this status last. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. It covers tools and methodologies, languages, data structures, and algorithms. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 4. The one exception is that accepting a paper after just minor revisions (e. 10 AE reviewing, Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022. • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. I submitted my manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne system. The Editor will take into Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. Now what? Feb 18, 2022 | Scholarly publishing. However, now in August the status of the manuscript has remained "Awaiting EIC decision" for more than a few days. Usually, the journal's guidelines should state what has to be done for the major revision and how to report on it. " Does this I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. What can this mean? The platform is For revisions, the process starts over again – selecting reviewers, obtaining reviews, and making a recommendation. This change has occurred Hi. The journal considers a range of paper types, including new research, reviews, perspectives, evidence synthesis, and “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. It is likely that it isn't going out for peer review after all? See best practice guidance for the following: Reviewer verification Review content; Reviewing a paper yourself ; Peer reviews by early career researchers Recommended reviewers Reviewer verification. However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. This means that the submission needs extensive work and will need to be sent back to the I submitted a paper to a science journal and 3 months later I got result which requires 'Major Revision'. procession - Awaiting administrative processing Journal scope and submission types. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. May I know is there any chances for at least to get a major revision. r/AskAcademia A chip A Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. comments and decide the next steps for the After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. I made all the required amendments and submit again. " Does it mean that my paper will go through The status is shown as “awaiting reviewer selection” apparently because the editor is still waiting for reviewers to accept the invitation to review. 22 Accepted This editor works really fast, and the reviewer's comments are very detailed. The suggestions made for the paper did not improve it even a I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). How Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. Good Luck! 2022/10/17 Status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/3/27 Major revision submission, Status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2023/3/19 Status: Under review 2023/5/26 Status: Accept The review process took a long time, a total of 225 days, but finally everything is settled before graduation! It recieved "minor revisions" a bit over a month ago, and I submitted the revisions a little over three weeks ago. Share. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? The paper is a 'revise and resubmit' (major revision) so I think it would only go back to the reviewers that already read it (max 3). In this situation, if all requested changes are made, a minor Is it normal to have the status "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" pop up a day or two after submitting a minor revision? My understanding was that once a minor revision was submitted the paper would not go out for further peer-review? This is a journal using the ScholarOne system. If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. The Handbook provides you with: • A guide to the various ways in which you can search for potential reviewers I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). However, the editor asked me to improve my abstract, introduction, and structure (as a second major You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. Your article has now received the minimum number of reviews required to make a decision. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer assignment'. 15 Review comments returned, major revision 2. I revised and resubmitted. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". 14 AE reviewing, Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2022. These types of revisions include adding new sections, providing more examples to illustrate the points made, or significant rewriting to improve the clarity, flow, or quality of Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. The article fulfills all of the requirements listed above and is ready for publication. 7-14 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 8-3 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment One reviewer accepted the paper after major revisions, while another claimed lack of innovation and rejected it. You mention that the status is “Awaiting reviewer selection” under “Minor revision” and you also mention that you re-submitted your manuscript after major revisions. The five allowable Editorial decisions are: Revisions Authors who receive a decision of Minor Revision or Major Revision have 20, and 40 days, respectively, to resubmit the revised manuscript. Sage does not permit the use of author-suggested (recommended) reviewers at any stage of the submission process, be that through the web based submission system or other communication. ” Why has nothing been done with it? In some cases, ScholarOne will show that status even if a manuscript is under review. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. This change has occurred I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. 4. Copy the reviewer comments and answer each and every of them while also helpfully pointing out related changes to the manuscript. This change has occurred Awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks after peer review process I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. During reject and resubmit, I got The EiC usually reaches a decision within 3 days after receiving the AEs recommendation. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. Then I wholly revised my paper according to reviewers’ comments and re-submitted it. It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained changes to the introduction and literature review. You I have an experience of getting two minor revisions and finally article was rejected, othe other hand another article was accepted after major revision. As a peer reviewer, it is useful to learn about common reasons for a 'major revision' verdict. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I submitted the Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. Click the blue “Take Action” checkmark. The Editor will take into I have submitted a manuscript to a pediatrics-related journal. 2022 Awaiting final decision Major Revision (acceptance after one major revision and one minor revision, editor status as major revision) 9. It status changed very quickly from 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection' to 'Awaiting Reviewer Scores'. Major Revision: The manuscript may be accepted with major revisions. Was your notation non-standard, for example? 2023. Furthermore, you can get inspired by sample peer like what @Eppicurt said, it's hard to tell without knowing the details, but if after the first round of review, the verdict is "minor revision", and you've done what the reviewers suggested, then I would say it has a good chance of being accepted (this is from my own experience both as author and reviewer, but NOT in biology field), worst case you probably A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. After the second revision, one reviewer accepted it, one reviewer made minor revisions, and one reviewer made major revisions. The author is usually given a deadline of a few weeks to a few months; this may be extended upon request, for more information see Can I have extension to submit my revision? Additionally, some journals ask the author to submit a point Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. 2 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 少林淫僧 2023-07-30 May I ask, after AWPL rejects and resubmits, will the reviewer remain the same? In the past, the journals I submitted to required major revisions, so I am unsure if I should include a revision report for this rejection and resubmission format. The Editor will determine if additional input is needed from reviewers. " Related reading: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? [email protected] Submitted my paper. After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Review Settings . g. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. If the evaluations require major revisions and the paper has been submitted as I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. TOSEM also reports on We have written a revised manuscript since the original version is received a decision of "major revision. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer reports, everything seems quite in time. A paper classified as major revision is I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. Awaiting Reviewer Selection. I submitted a manuscript to a SAGE journal through ScholarOne 4 months ago. I submitted a manuscript to a journal using scholarone manuscript system, and later got a decision of major revision. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. This Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. I submitted a paper to a journal that used scholarone and the reviewers recommended a major revision. For minor revisions, some editors might make a decision on their A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. Also, the statuses appeared very shortly after submission so I would be surprised if the reviewers had time to read and comment so fast. 28 major revision 11. 30 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment After double checking the Response to reviewers at major revision stage, we still believe that we have addressed reviewer#2 comments adequately (at least straightforward comments like putting the No, it is very unlikely to succeed unless you do major modifications, addressing the concerns of the reviewer(s). Review and selection of manuscripts. 11. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. A few months ago, I submitted my paper. Before reviewing for Proceedings A, please familiarise yourself with the scope of the journal. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. What factors delay a final decision in the editorial process. I would write your best revision and include a very strongly (but politely and professionally) constructed and worded cover letter directly addressing the reviewer's points including the fact that Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. This change has occurred Once you have resubmitted your paper, it will once again be reviewed. ) Keep in mind that neither a major nor a minor revision are approving the paper as is. 18 Submit 9. The article has significant deficiencies in content and grammar. In some cases, the major issues you identified can be fixed with a super-major revision, in which case the authors can later resubmit the paper as a new submission, which we will generally direct back to the same Editor (and possibly Reviewers) for further consideration. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. My manuscript had earlier gone through English proofreading by a professional vendor. The day after the submission though, the two statuses of ‘Awaiting It means that the paper is just not up to the quality we require for TWC. 05. Now, from my earlier experience, I am worried uf they again take 5 months to review a minor revision, or suggest something else (like a major revision after a long time). submissions that you expect to accept after one revision. I made all necessary changes recommended by reviewers and resubmitted the paper about 12 days ago. 11 Accepted The changes in the submission status can be referred to by everyone. Minor Revision. They gave until 8/3 to submit my revisions, but I didn’t need all that time and I submitted my Skip to main content. Now for the last 2 weeks, it's showing awaiting EIC. Most important, however is to try to address the reasons why you weren't understood. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. Does this After selecting The TQM Journal, I read carefully the instructions that are provided by the journal itself. (To be sure, the kinds of minor revisions I've suggested may also be necessary as part of a broader slate of major revisions for an article. The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. For further insights, you may go through this related query by another researcher: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? So, great. I wa 17. Can I send a email to AE? The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections:. reviewer selection. 18 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2022. Awaiting Editor Decision. 08 Awaiting reviewer scores 10. Reviewer feedback At IOP Publishing, we have implemented a system to offer reviewers feedback on their reports. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. Choose 'Editor Center' and then click on 'Awaiting Referee Selection' C. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. 06. 18 Awaiting Admin Assignment 9. After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". So, please give me Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. The status of the paper changed several times. 1. For example, minor revisions would not entail conducting a bunch of new analyses or overhauling part of the manuscript. Hoping for good news and praying for a speedy acceptance! I have successfully revised a paper with a reject from one reviewer, through a major revision, into an accepted article. Even then, resubmission after rejection may be impossible. 2) Major Revision. Choose Major Revision if a paper has real potential, but a large component should be redone and re-reviewed. But there is still no response. After 14 days, I received the decision [communication] that both the reviewers agreed that I had addressed their questions and that the paper could be published. I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. Now I want to submit my manuscript to another journal, but it would be a duplicate submission in this situation. Many small grammar mistakes and details in the figures were pointed out. 9. 2022 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 18. However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. The journal told me previously that this review process might take from 4-6 months Designing and building a large, complex software system is a tremendous challenge. 8. We request that authors suggest reviewers in their cover letters, but we also leave it at the Editor’s discretion to select appropriate reviewers. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) publishes papers on all aspects of that challenge: specification, design, development and maintenance. I submitted my manuscript to a journal. ahj syk tqyha bqm kjdabvb okke krah ubq olhnph nzxukgn